The Quantum Delusion: Why Smart People Are Dumb About What They Know

Categories: ,

Time to Read:

9–13 minutes

by J.C.White

Why are so many smart people so dumb when it comes to the thing I believe? I mean, literally it seems half of the world is dumb and the other half smart… like me. Or, perhaps, unlike me. Unfortunately, we’re both right.

Let’s face it: the world would make a whole lot more sense if everyone just saw things the way we do. We could finally end political strife, cancel social media, and maybe even bring back civil Thanksgiving dinners. But no; half the planet insists on living in a different dimension, where facts are optional, logic is elastic, and every disagreement is a personal affront to God, country, humanity, and grandma’s banana puddin’ recipe.

So what’s going on here? Why do seemingly intelligent people, people who can build bridges, perform brain surgeries, launch rockets to the moon, and bake croissants from scratch, suddenly turn into drooling morons the moment politics, religion, or pineapple on pizza comes up?

Believe it or not, Werner Heisenberg, the German physicist famous for the Uncertainty Principle, might have an answer. And no, it’s not because your uncle on Facebook is a lost cause (though he probably is). It’s because, according to Heisenberg, reality itself doesn’t exist independently of our perception.

That’s right, our version of reality is basically a customized playlist, hand-curated by the quirks of our own observation.


The Heisenberg Headache

Heisenberg’s theory was first applied to quantum mechanics, not politics. He discovered that the more precisely we try to measure one property of a particle, say, its position, the less precisely we can know another property, like its momentum. Observation itself changes the thing being observed.

Translated from physics into psychology, that means reality doesn’t come pre-packaged. It’s not a frozen dinner of immutable truth waiting to be microwaved by your superior intellect. It’s more like a buffet: you pick what looks most appetizing, and leave the weird jiggly jello salad for someone else.

In other words, every time we look at the world, we change it. Every time we interpret a fact, we bend it. Every time we post an opinion, we collapse an infinite number of possible realities into our preferred one; the one that sounds best to us.

And because our brains crave consistency the way toddlers crave sugar, we keep feeding ourselves the version that feels most comfortable, regardless of whether it’s true.


Welcome to Reality, Made to Order

Think about how you form opinions. You hear a story on the news. You read an article that confirms it. You see a meme that reinforces it. Before long, you’ve built a tiny, well-furnished apartment inside your mind, a mental condo where everything you believe fits just right.

Then someone dares to disagree.

Suddenly, your safe, cozy condo feels like it’s under siege. You grab your metaphorical pitchfork (or your keyboard) and defend it as if your very soul depends on it.

Why? Because it does.

See, Heisenberg would argue that we’re not merely observers of reality, we’re participants. Observation is creation. By seeing, we choose what’s real. By believing, we cement it. So when someone challenges our belief, it’s not just an intellectual dispute; it’s a threat to the very structure of our universe.

That’s why debates on social media escalate faster than a toddler tantrum in the candy aisle. All want to teach. Nobody’s trying to learn; and everyone’s trying to preserve their personal version of existence.


The Quantum Ego

You can think of your belief system as a kind of quantum superposition: infinite possibilities swirling around until the moment you decide which one “feels right.” Once you make that choice, poof!, the wave collapses. Reality becomes fixed, and suddenly you’re living in a world where your opinion isn’t an opinion at all, but the truth.

The tricky part is, everyone else is doing the same thing.

So while you’re confidently broadcasting the truth about climate change, gun control, or which barbecue sauce is superior, someone else, equally intelligent and confident, is broadcasting the opposite truth from their own parallel universe.

Both of you can’t be right.
But both of you feel right.
And in the human brain, feeling right is often more satisfying than being right.


The Safety Blanket of Certainty

Humans, bless our hearts, are not built for uncertainty. We are walking contradiction machines, terrified of chaos but addicted to it. Heisenberg’s theory tells us that uncertainty is baked into the fabric of the universe, but try telling that to someone whose worldview depends on being 100% correct about everything from theology to the correct pronunciation of “GIF.”

So, we build mental safety nets. We pick the version of reality that lets us sleep at night, the one that tells us we’re the heroes of our own story and not the confused extras in someone else’s plot.

We need our beliefs to feel safe, enlightened, and, let’s be honest, superior.

That’s the secret sauce of ideology. It’s not that we hate being wrong; it’s that we can’t survive feeling uncertain. We’d rather distort the facts, reinterpret the evidence, or invent new physics than admit we might be mistaken.

We aren’t protecting truth, we’re protecting comfort.


Confirmation Bias: The Human Operating System

Psychologists call it confirmation bias. Heisenberg would call it observation collapse. I call it the reason Birthday’s and Thanksgiving dinners end in tears.

When we encounter information that agrees with what we already believe, our brains light up like a Christmas tree. Dopamine floods our system, and we feel validated, vindicated, and, for a brief shimmering moment, enlightened.

When we encounter information that disagrees with us, our brains slam the shutters. We rationalize, reinterpret, or flat-out ignore it. It’s not that we’re stupid; it’s that our brains are running an outdated operating system coded for survival, not truth.

Our ancestors didn’t have time to ponder whether the rustling in the grass was a tiger or just the wind. They had to make a fast decision. The ones who chose a reality that kept them alive passed their genes to us. The others became tiger food.

So now, instead of tigers, we face Facebook posts. And we still pick whichever version of reality feels safest.


Dumb Luck Disguised as Intelligence

Here’s the kicker: even when we’re right, it’s often dumb luck. More often than not, we’re both wrong.

You might nail your prediction about the economy, the election, or which celebrity couple will implode next, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you understood the system. It might just mean you guessed correctly this time. The next time, you’ll probably be wrong, and you’ll have a perfectly good explanation for why this time was different.

We’re brilliant at rationalizing our own correctness and even better at forgetting our wrongness. We curate our memories like Instagram feeds, deleting the blurry failures and highlighting the photogenic victories.

That’s how we stay convinced we’re smarter than the people who disagree with us. We’re not just right; we’re righteously right; we’re guardians of the sacred truth, ordained by logic, common sense, or divine revelation (depending on which side of the internet you’re on).

Meanwhile, from a cosmic perspective, we’re all stumbling around in the dark, bumping into furniture, and insisting we meant to do that.


The Multiplicity of Realities

If Heisenberg were alive today, he might scroll through X/Twitter for five minutes and then throw his Nobel Prize into the sea. Every timeline, every comment section, every thread is a microcosm of quantum reality: millions of observers collapsing millions of potential worlds into personal truths.

In one universe, vaccines save lives.
In another, they contain government tracking chips.
In one universe, climate change is an existential threat.
In another, it’s a Chinese hoax.
In one universe, pineapple belongs on pizza.
In another, you are a culinary war criminal.

Each observer looks at the same data, the same events, the same physical universe, and sees a different reality. The observation itself creates the difference.

It’s not that reality is fake; it’s that reality is plural. And each version feels self-evident to the person living inside it.


How We Reconcile the Distortions

Here’s where the comedy turns tragic. When our chosen version of reality starts to crack, when the evidence becomes too obvious to ignore, we don’t abandon it. We patch it.

We retrofit our belief system with new justifications, mental duct tape, and conspiracy theories until it’s good as new.

Someone caught lying? They were framed.
A prophecy didn’t come true? It’s a metaphor.
Your favorite politician caught with a briefcase of cash? That’s just “deep state” theater.

We are Olympic-level contortionists when it comes to reconciling distortion. Anything to keep our reality intact. Because losing it would mean losing ourselves.


The Paradox of Being Human

And that’s the cosmic joke, isn’t it?
We are simultaneously the smartest species on the planet and the most delusional. We can split atoms but can’t split a dinner bill without argument. We can map the universe yet can’t agree on the shape of the Earth.

We’ve built supercomputers that can simulate the birth of galaxies, and we use them to prove that our neighbor’s political meme is wrong.

Heisenberg showed us that the act of observation limits our ability to know everything with certainty. The human condition took that idea and ran a marathon with it: we choose to know only what we want to know.

We might all be standing in the same room, but we’re each looking through our own kaleidoscope, turning the same fragments into completely different pictures and insisting that ours is the only one in focus.


Dumb Luck and Divine Confidence

So, if we’re honest, most of us are not as wise as we appear. We’re just occasionally lucky. Our reality happens to match the facts this time. Tomorrow it might not.

That’s why humility is the most underrated intellectual virtue. Admitting “I might be wrong” doesn’t mean you are wrong; it just means you’re aware that you’re human, and therefore, statistically speaking, frequently full of shit.

But humility doesn’t come naturally to us. Our egos are like poorly trained dogs, loud, needy, and allergic to correction. So we double down, bark louder, and call everyone else a fool.

It’s not that we’re evil. It’s that evolution wired us for survival, not enlightenment. Belief makes us feel stable. Certainty makes us feel powerful. And being right, especially in front of other people, makes us feel divine.


The Dumb Truth About Smart People

It’s easy to think dumb people are the problem, but the real trouble starts when smart people believe they’re immune to bias. Smart people don’t make fewer mistakes; they just make more sophisticated ones. They build better arguments, use bigger words, and cherry-pick peer-reviewed studies instead of Facebook memes.

But it’s the same brain, the same bias, the same Heisenbergian trap: observation shaping belief, belief shaping observation.

We aren’t seeing the world as it is, we’re seeing the world as it agrees with us.


A Reality Check (Sort Of)

If there’s any moral to this absurd, quantum-flavored human comedy, it’s that nobody’s reality is complete. We’re all missing pieces of the puzzle, and most of us don’t even realize we’re holding the wrong box cover.

Maybe the best we can do is trade pieces. Listen, argue, laugh at ourselves, and recognize that every belief, no matter how sacred, might just be the result of a cosmic coin toss. Because you’re wasting your time thinking you’re educating anyone. They’re educating you as successfully as you’re educating them.

Because when you zoom out far enough, the universe isn’t divided into right and wrong, red and blue, smart and dumb, it’s just a bunch of particles jittering in the void, pretending they know what they’re doing.

And in that sense, we’re all Heisenberg’s children: confused, confident, and hopelessly human.


The Final Irony

So the next time you’re sure, absolutely sure, that you’re right and everyone else is an idiot, take comfort. You might be right. You might also be spectacularly wrong. The only way to tell is by collapsing a few more wave functions, a.k.a. arguing on the internet until someone blocks you.

But in the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t matter much. Reality will keep existing in its unfathomable, uncertain glory, and you’ll keep observing it through your own beautifully flawed lens.

Because in the end, we’re not so much discovering the world as inventing it, one opinion at a time. And if dumb luck occasionally makes us look brilliant, well, that’s the most human thing of all.

Responses

  1. Mags Win Avatar

    Very interesting read.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Diana L Forsberg Avatar

    I would argue that there are some undeniable truths out there (such as the world is not flat). But of course, I may or may not be right about that. Interesting post. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      It’s kinda fun to think about, though. Maybe there’s more to it than we think. I was certainly curious enough to share it for debate, just to see what personalities emerge. Yours, of course, always curiously diplomatic. Which, to be fair, is about where I stand on the matter.
      It’s hard to write a blog on someone else’s theory about logic not really being logic, and not feel insecure about your own logic. But I’m one of those ‘see both sides’ kinda guys anyway. Thanks for chiming in as always.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Warren R. Johnson Avatar

    Whew! I kept thinking enlightenment had to come up eventually, and you didn’t disappoint. our brains crave consistency. I’m not sure about “our brains crave consistency”. I think a scatttered brain under control has the possibility for an ever-expanding brain; i.e., a brain at rest doesn’t grow. I’d vote for variety to keep stimulated and regenerating. I’ll quit while I’m ahead.?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Haha. A lot to unpack. I guess I’m a sucker for riddles. A gothic story hidden inside a philosophers box tied with silk ribbon. Or, maybe the philosophy is just old and irrelevant. I don’t know. Fun anyway.

      Like

  4. The Quantum Delusion: Why Smart People Are Dumb About What They Know – Health is Wealth Avatar

    […] The Quantum Delusion: Why Smart People Are Dumb About What They Know […]

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Violet Lentz Avatar

    I like to believe there are very few absolutes in life. The rule of law in my mind is- are you trying to be helpful or hurtful? the answer to that simple question varies- but I am only responsible for the correct answer to me- and even then- at only that moment in time. Lots of food for thought here, Chris.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Yep, i agree. Life’s too uncertain and organic to worship absolutes. I just ask myself, “what’s the next best thing I can do?,” then do that. Like you, I don’t concern myself with what others are doing or would do. Great perspectives.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. nhpureandsimple Avatar

    That’s interesting. And, yes nowadays, thanks to social media, many want to teach, but the problem is they are neither qualified nor willing to learn. Worse still, they barely pause to listen.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Agreed. I think there’s more power in humility than confidence. At least it’s honest. And we all crave authenticity over hyperbole.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. joannerambling Avatar

    This was too long for me to read it all, my mind starts to wonder as I start thinking about what I am reading, That said what I did read had me nodding my head in agreement, some of the smartest people in the world are also some of the dumbest. Me, well I’m not smart but I am also not dumb, well I don’t think I’m dumb

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Yeah, I get it. I probably over-told it, just trying to be cute about it instead of preachy, but I hear ya. I’m even questioning my own smarts now. Wondering if people read my blogs and say to themselves, “wow, this guy’s so ignorant.”
      I’m ok being the book you can never finish. And I very much appreciate the time you invest in my work as well as these writing autopsies afterward.
      I’m thinking about my next being more flash fiction. Perhaps not as graphic as my last. We definitely want you to find something that entertains you; something short and sweet.

      Like

  8. David Avatar

    Some very true comments there. While I love a good debate and have trained myself to re-evaluate my opinion as more information comes in (something that was essential in my job of designing user-facing business computer systems) our view of the world is a mental short-cut to determine how to respond to what happens around us. Mostly this is useful, but sometimes it can be dangerous – “that rustle in the grass is the wind, the Great Juju wouldn’t let me be eaten by a lion”.
    Confirmation bias is the current evil with the social media algorithms designed to support your bias because that will keep you engaged (at least that is my biased view). I have countless “discussions” with my wife after she watches a series of advertorials on some “health treatment” that I can find not supporting medical evidence for.
    However a word of warning about challenging people’s beliefs. When I was young and thoughtless at engineering university and flatting with a group of friends we had a persistent ‘visitor’ pushing his religious view. In frustration we finally started challenging his claims and ended up damaging the entire foundation of his life. While that was regrettable and I now never get into that type of discussion, we were only doing to him what he was trying to do to us, but our world view was wider and more robust than his.
    Now I just let people sit in their (to me) misguided beliefs.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      The best strategy is usually to simply watch the train wreck. I totally agree. Thanks

      Like

  9. jchristophergilliam Avatar

    This reminds me of the book “I Moved Your Cheese” by Deepak Malhotra which was a take on the story ‘Who moved my cheese.” Essentially there are three categories of folk: Those who simply chase the ‘cheese’, those who recognize the ‘chase’ is simply a means of control, and those that are in control. Those who are in control (ie the lab assistants running the maze experiments) want everyone else (the mice) to simply chase the ‘cheese’. Those who recognize the control either seek to make it more efficient, destroy it, or ignore it altogether and transcend. The ones who agree with or argue against the control are easily managed, but what the ones in control fear the most are the ones who transcend especially if they teach others to do so as well.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      That’s very interesting, I’d not heard about that book or story before but it does seem to parallel. Thanks for sharing.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. jchristophergilliam Avatar

    Another aspect of your passage reminds me of the Overton Window principle. Essentially, what is happening lately is that scope of what is genuinely ‘acceptable’ is not evolving fast enough for the demands of the more radical elements of society. These ‘radical elements’ had the ears of all the popular media outlets after numerous years of gentle discourse, but now adays, such patient shift in beliefs and tolerance are no longer moving fast enough nor broad enough. To many folk, they are now espousing beliefs that are aberrant to more and more of the majority and thus have out paced the ‘Window’. This along with growing adversarial nature of this shift is causing more and more folk to tune in. People who would be completely indifferent, oblivious, and/or refuse to buy into these often factually wrong ‘realities’ are being labeled as enemies and now are being actively attacked. I could go into pages of reporting that this has been going on for decades within our own country, but the bottom line is that one side got too greedy with the amount of power perceived/given/attained and began chewing off the hands (arms, legs, etc) that were feeding it. They shifted too far beyond the window and found their support suddenly gone, the illusion dispelled, and their ‘reality’ no longer affecting others the way they wanted it to. So instead of quietly accepting they pushed things too far and seek unity through reconciliation, they chose violence, destruction, and murder to desperately hold on to that ‘reality’.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      That’s very interesting. I should find and read it. Thanks for contributing.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Susan St.Pierre Avatar

    Fantastic! Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Danny*Fantod Avatar

    Good one. I’ll share this on X if that’s okay.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Thank you! No problem.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. Lina Valkema Avatar

    “Both of you can’t be right.
    But both of you feel right.
    And in the human brain, feeling right is often more satisfying than being right”

    Powerful line right there. This was a very insightful read. Thank you for sharing! I’ll be thinking about this for a while :)

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Thank you very much Lina.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. EnchiPants Avatar

    Wow. This was a brilliant read. Thank you for putting words to my swirly thoughts. Absolutely LOVE Quantum anything :P

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Thanks so much.

      Liked by 1 person

  15. Cynthia Avatar

    Yes humans are intelligent. And delusional. Well at least half of us. :) But yes, I still feel I must stand up to the delusional ones. Thanks for a great read.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Chris White Avatar

      Thank you Cynthia.

      Like